Original Research

Prognostic Value of Metabolic Tumor Volume Measured by 18F-FDG PET/CT in Esophageal Cancer Patients

10.4274/Mirt.07379

  • Çiğdem Soydal
  • Cabir Yüksel
  • Nuriye Özlem Küçük
  • İlker Ökten
  • Elgin Özkan
  • Beyza Doğanay Erdoğan

Received Date: 07.08.2013 Accepted Date: 16.12.2013 Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther 2014;23(1):12-15 PMID: 24653929

Objective:

In this study, we aimed to explore prognostic importance of definition of preoperative metabolic tumor volume in esophageal cancer patients.

Methods:

22 patients who have histologically proven stage IIA-III esophageal cancer and underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT for preoperative staging of disease were included to the study. After 18F-FDG PET/CT, all the patients underwent surgery within 4 weeks period. Patients have been followed up until death or Sept 15th, 2012. Dates of death were recorded for survival analysis. During evaluation of 18F-FDG PET/CT images, metabolic tumor volumes were calculated by drawing the isocontour region of interests from all visually positive FGD uptake lesions.

Results:

22 patients (15M, 7F; mean age: 65.1±8.4, min-max:48-80) underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT for preoperative staging of esophageal cancer. Preoperative diagnosis was squamous cell and adeno cancer in 17 (%77) and 5 (%23) patients, respectively. Location of primary tumor is distal, proximal and mid-esophagus in 13 (%59), 6 (%27) and 3 (%13) patients, respectively. Primary tumor of all the patients were FDG avid (mean SUVmax: 18.85±7.0; range: 5.5-35.1). Additionally, 18F-FDG uptake was seen in mediastinal lymph nodes in 13 patients (5.45±8.15; range: 2.6-29.9). Mean metabolic tumor volumes of primary esophageal lesions were calculated as 8.77±8.46cm³ (range: 2.3-34.2). Mean MTV of lymph nodes was 2.44±1.01cm³ (range: 0.4-3.6). Mean total metabolic tumor volume was calculated as 9.99±8.58cm³ (range: 2.3-27.3). 10 patients died during 447±121 days follow-up period. Mean survival time was 11.9±1.5 months (95%CI: 8.99-14.74) for entire patient group. Total metabolic tumor volume had a significant effect on survival (p=0.045) according to Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. One unit increase in MTV caused 1.1 (95%CI:1.003-1.196) fold increase in hazard, at any time.

Conclusion

Definition of preoperative metabolic tumor volume has a prognostic value in the prediction of postoperative survival times. Patients who have higher preoperative metabolic tumor volumes could be good candidates for more aggressive chemo-radiation therapy regiments.

Keywords: Esophageal cancer,positron-emission tomography/computed tomography,tumor volume

Introduction

Esophageal cancer is the eighth most common malignancy and one of the most common causes of cancer related mortality (1). Disease prognosis is strongly related with stage at diagnosis, because for most patients diagnosed at late-stage of disease, 5 years survival has been reported to be less than 20% (2). Resectability and overall prognosis depend on tumor stage and disease extent (3).

Recently, metabolic tumor volume (MTV) measured by 18F-FDG PET/CT has been described as a new prognostic factor in several tumors (4,5,6,7). Because of nonhomogeneous metabolic pattern of tumors, definition of metabolic tumor volume could be more valuable than measurement of maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax).

In this study, we aimed to explore prognostic importance of preoperative metabolic tumor volume in stage IIA-III esophageal cancer patients.


Materials and Methods

Patients

This retrospective study was designed to search esophageal cancer patients who were referred for 18F-FDG PET/CT for preoperative staging of disease between February 2011 and April 2012. Patients who have previous neoadjuvant chemotherapy history or inoperable disease were excluded from the study. Thus, 22 patients who have histologically proven stage IIA-III esophageal cancer and underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT for preoperative staging of disease were included to the study. After 18F-FDG PET/CT, all the patients underwent surgery within 4 weeks period. Patients have been followed up until death or 15th Sept, 2012. Dates of death were recorded for survival analysis.

18F-FDG PET/CT

PET/CT images were acquired with a GE Discovery ST PET/CT scanner. Patients fasted at least 6 hours before imaging and blood glucose levels were checked. Those with a blood glucose level above 150 mg/dL did not undergo scanning. Oral contrast was given to all patients. Images from the vertex to the proximal femur were obtained while the patients were in the supine position. Whole body 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging was performed approximately 1 hour after an intravenous injection of 8-10 mCi 18F-FDG. During the waiting period, patients rested in a quiet room without taking any muscle relaxants. PET images were acquired for 4 minutes per bed position. Emission PET images were reconstructed with noncontrast CT images. CT images were also obtained from the patient’s integrated F18-FDG PET/CT with the use of a standardized protocol of 140 kV, 70 mA, tube rotation time of 0.5 s per rotation, a pitch of 6 and a slice thickness of 5 mm. Patients were allowed to breathe normally during the procedure. Attenuation-corrected PET/CT fusion images were reviewed in three planes (transaxial, coronal and sagittal) on a Xeleris Workstation 4.2 (GE Medical Systems). PET/CT images were evaluated and confirmed visually and semi-quantitatively with standardized uptake value (SUV) by consensus of two experienced nuclear medicine specialists. During evaluation of 18F-FDG PET/CT images, MTVs were calculated by drawing automatically the isocontour region of interests (ROI) from all visually FDG uptake lesions.

Surgical Procedures

After 18F-FDG PET/CT, all the patients underwent partial esophagus resection procedures according to localization of primary tumors and regional lymph node dissection within 1-4 weeks period. Adjuvant systemic chemotherapy was given to stage III patients.

Statistical Analysis

Data were summarized as mean±standard deviation. Mean survival time and its standard error along with 95% confidence interval (CI) for entire patient group was calculated taking into account censored data information using Kaplan Meier analysis. Cox proportional hazards regression model was conducted to determine the effect of MTVs for survival. A value of P<0.05 was considered significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS computer statistical software (version 15.0; SPSS, Chicago, Illinois).


Results

Patients

22 patients (15M, 7F; mean age:65.1±8.4, min-max:48-80) underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT for preoperative staging of esophageal cancer. Preoperative diagnosis was squamous cell and adeno cancer in 17 (%77) and 5 (%23) patients, respectively. Location of primary tumor is distal, proximal and mid-esophagus in 13 (%59), 6 (%27) and 3 (%13) patients, respectively. None of the patients had taken neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. All the patients had undergone diagnostic thorax CT 1-4 months before 18F-FDG PET/CT.

18F-FDG PET/CT

All the patients underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT for preoperative staging of disease. Primary tumor of all the patients were FDG avid (mean SUVmax: 18.85±7.0; range:5.5-35.1). Additionally, 18F-FDG uptake was seen in mediastinal lymph nodes in 13 patients (5.45±8.15; min-max:2.6-29.9). Mean MTV of primary esophageal lesions was calculated as 8.77±8.46cm³ (range:2.3-34.2). Mean MTV of lymph nodes was 2.44±1.01cm³ (range:0.4-3.6). Total MTV were computed by sum of primary tumor volumes and lymph nodes. Mean total MTV was calculated as 9.99±8.58cm³ (range:2.3-27.3). Two examples for calculation of MTVs were demonstrated in Figure 1 and 2.

Survival

10 patients died during 447±121 days of follow-up period. Mean survival time was 11.9±1.5 months (95% CI: 8.99-14.74) for entire patient group. Total MTV had significant effect on survival (p=0.045) according to Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. One unit increase in total MTV caused 1.1 (95%CI:1.003-1.196) fold increase in hazard, at any time.


Discussion

Prediction of disease prognosis and survival in preoperative period is crucial for consideration of more aggressive pre or postoperative adjuvant treatments in selected esophageal cancer patients (8). 18F-FDG PET/CT is a metabolic imaging method and its usefulness in esophageal cancer patients has been reported in several studies (9,10,11,12). SUV has been widely used parameter for evaluation of FDG uptake degree of several tumor types. However, because generally tumors have nonhomogeneous 18F-FDG uptake pattern, SUV could be a rough parameter in the evaluation of total lesion glucose metabolism.

Recently, new studies focused on evaluation of tumor burden by metabolic tumor volume measurements instead of evaluation of SUV. It is reported that MTV is a prognostic factor for prediction of disease prognosis in several tumors (4,5,6,7). In this study we described the prognostic importance of delineation of preoperative MTV in esophageal cancer patients. We only included operable stage IIA-III patients for standardization of patients. In inoperable advanced stage patients, disease prognosis could be affected by several factors such as different chemo or radiation therapy protocols. Prognostic role of MTV might be explored in inoperable patients who took similar chemoradiation therapy regiments. However in this case delineation of MTVs might be practically impossible in patients who have multiple distant metastases.

Predictive value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of regional lymph node metastases has been investigated by Hsu et al. (12). They concluded that SUVmax of extra-tumoral uptake and the number of PET abnormalities were significantly associated with N classification. I et al. have reported relationship between MTV and lymph node status in esophageal cancer patients (3). We investigated prognostic value of MTV in esophageal cancer patients. Because lymph node status and disease stage are strongly correlated with disease prognosis, results of our study are concordant with the literature. We found a statistically significant relationship between MTV and survival times. However we could not define a threshold for MTV to predict disease prognosis because of the limited number of patients. Larger and prospective new studies are needed to describe possible threshold for MTV in esophageal cancer. Preliminary results of this study might lead to establish new studies in this area.


Conclusion

Definition of preoperative MTV is a prognostic value in the prediction of postoperative survival times. Patients who have higher preoperative MTVs could be good candidates for more aggressive chemo-radiation therapy regiments.
1. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer 2010:127;2893-2917.
2. Stavrou EP, McElroy HJ, Baker DF, Smith G, Bishop JF. Adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus: incidence and survival rates in New South Wales, 1972–2005. Med J Aust 2009:191;310-314.
3. I HS, Kim SJ, Kim IJ, Kim K. Predictive value of metabolic tumor volume measured by 18F-FDG PET for regional lymph node status in patients with esophageal cancer. Clin Nucl Med 2012;37:442-446.
4. Hyun SH, Choi JY, Shim YM, Kim K, Lee SJ, Cho YS, Lee JY, Lee KH, Kim BT. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume measured by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with esophageal carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2010;17:115-122.
5. Miller TR, Grigsby PW. Measurement of tumor volume by PET to evaluate prognosis in patients with advanced cervical cancer treated by radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002;53:353-359.
6. Chen MK, Chen TH, Liu JP, Chang CC, Chie WC. Better prediction of prognosis for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma using primary tumor volume. Cancer 2004;100:2160-2166.
7. Chen MK, Chen TH, Liu JP, Chang CC, Chie WC. Metabolic tumor burden predicts for disease progression and death in lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007;69:328-333.
8. Kuwano H, Sumiyoshi K, Sonoda K, Kitamura K, Tsutsui S, Toh Y, Kitamura M, Sugimachi K. Relationship between preoperative assessment of organ function and postoperative morbidity in patients with oesophageal cancer. Eur J Surg 1998;164:581-586.
9. Kato H, Kuwano H, Nakajima M, Miyazaki T, Yoshikawa M, Ojima H, Tsukada K, Oriuchi N, Inoue T, Endo K. Comparison between positron emission tomography and computed tomography in the use of the assessment of esophageal carcinoma. Cancer 2002;94:921-928.
10. Okada M, Murakami T, Kumano S, Kuwabara M, Shimono T, Hosono M, Shiozaki H. Integrated FDG-PET/CT compared with intravenous contrast-enhanced CT for evaluation of metastatic regional lymph nodes in patients with resectable early stage esophageal cancer. Ann Nucl Med 2009;23:73-80.
11. Gillies RS, Middleton MR, Maynard ND, Bradley KM, Gleeson FV. Additional benefit of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose integrated positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the staging of oesophageal cancer. Eur Radiol 2011;21:274-280.
12. Gillies RS, Middleton MR, Maynard ND, Bradley KM, Gleeson FV. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography in predicting locoregional invasion in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg 2009;87:1564-1568.